emacs-orgmode archive search

1. Re: [O] BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2 (score: 477)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 11:25:54 -0400

I observe the same behavior with org installed from elpa/org-plus-contrib-20130916. Best, Ista

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00897.html (8,856 bytes)

2. Re: [O] BUG?: Org-src - Release 8.2 (score: 477)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 09:02:29 -0600

One possible reason for a lack of reply is the miss-tagging with "babel" in the subject line. This doesn't have anything to do with code block execution, so I've re-tagged the subject and hopefully s

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00896.html (8,924 bytes)

3. Re: [O] BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2 (score: 477)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 15:54:13 +0200

Just to reiterate - is this only me or others as well? I consider this as a serious problem, as it can result in loss of data. If it is only me, I have to dig deeper into my config. Cheers, Rainer <#

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00894.html (8,080 bytes)

4. [O] BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2 (score: 477)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:06:38 +0200

Just upgraded, to 8.2 and I found a bug: When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened. When I click int

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00856.html (7,298 bytes)

5. [O] BUG?: BABEL - Release 8.2 (score: 477)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:06:20 +0200

Just upgraded, to 8.2 and I found a bug: When starting to edit a code block via C-c ' everything works as expected and the code block is highlighted and an indirect buffer is opened. When I click int

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00855.html (7,117 bytes)

6. Re: [O] Release 8.2 (score: 473)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:07:01 +0200

Hi Mehul, thank you for this, I have made that change. - Carsten On 20.9.2013, at 06:32, Mehul Sanghvi <address@hidden> wrote: Maybe I'm being nit picky but here's a patch to get rid of a warning tha

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00847.html (10,362 bytes)

7. Re: [O] Release 8.2 (score: 473)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 00:32:58 -0400

Maybe I'm being nit picky but here's a patch to get rid of a warning that was coming up with lisp/ox-texinfo.el about using old-style backquotes. cheers,        mehul On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:27

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00846.html (9,573 bytes)

8. [O] Release 8.2 (score: 473)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:27:35 +0200

Hi everyone, I have just released version 8.2 of Org mode. This is rather a minor release, mainly designed to do some stabilization and cleanup before the merge into Emacs. Bastien will do this next

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00839.html (8,168 bytes)

9. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 463)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:29:28 +0200

Thanks, Rainer <#secure method=pgpmime mode=sign> -- Rainer M. Krug email: RMKrug<at>gmail<dot>com

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg01010.html (11,885 bytes)

10. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 463)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:15:29 +0200

I pushed this fix to maint and master. - Carsten Attachment: signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg01007.html (11,598 bytes)

11. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 463)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 08:48:30 +0200

That's what I was looking for - confirmation that is in somebodys processing queue. Thanks Carsten. Unfortunately I can't hel as I have barely the elisp knowledge to maintain my .emacs file. Yup - ex

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg01002.html (10,593 bytes)

12. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 463)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 18:02:36 +0200

Hi Rainer, hi Carsten, it does not get lost - it is in my queue. As are, unfortunately, another 35 threads with possible bugs. Help is definitely wanted. Please see below for my comments and a possib

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00985.html (10,370 bytes)

13. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 463)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2013 16:01:28 +0200

Hi before this gets lost - I think this is an serious bug, as it can easily lead to data loss. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer M. Krug email: RMKrug<at>gmail<dot>com Attachment: pgp6Mn2GKXHyU.pgp Descriptio

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00981.html (8,830 bytes)

14. [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 463)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:40:29 +0200

I just resend this bug report which has been confirmed by Ista Zahn. Updated via git ust now: Org-mode version 8.2 (release_8.2-14-ge5f16b @ /Users/rainerkrug/.emacs.d/org-mode/lisp/) When starting t

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg00943.html (8,288 bytes)

15. Re: [O] Release 8.2 (score: 454)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:55:21 -0400

On Sep 19, 2013, at 4:27 PM, Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> wrote: Microsoft Outlook support has been added to /org-mac-link.el/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Thanks

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-10/msg00113.html (7,532 bytes)

16. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 454)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:11:11 +0200

True - sounds very much like what Eric mentioned. I poster a question there [1]to see if Vitalie could implement support for org mode. Not at all - don't worry. Your comment is spot on. Cheers, Raine

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg01096.html (8,352 bytes)

17. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 454)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:39:28 +0200

On the ess list (emacs.ess.general) there has been the announcement [fn:2] of polymode [fn:1] recently, which is going in this direction. Since my elisp knowledge is limited to the least, this commen

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg01073.html (7,837 bytes)

18. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 454)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 16:00:39 +0200

I agree that sounds quite difficult, especially as it would involve quite a number of different modes when different languages are used. Keep in mind my very limited emacs knowledge - but wouldn't it

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg01047.html (10,195 bytes)

19. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 454)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:13:34 -0600

I don't think this is an attainable goal. Major modes assume that they are the sole owners of the current buffer and of the related state. Breaking this assumption would open a deep can of major-mod

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg01046.html (9,340 bytes)

20. Re: [O] [BUG] in Release 8.2 - editing code in indirect buffer (score: 454)

Author: HIDDEN

Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 09:38:41 +0200

This is definitely not an easy task, but which I think would be an very useful feature, making the work-flow of using embedded code much faster. Would be great, if there is would be a way of implemen

/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-09/msg01014.html (13,124 bytes)